Select the region for your Lambda function. Your administrator is the person that provided you with your user name and What solved it for me was adding my Lambda's role name to custom-roles.json per @sundersc 's workaround suggestion. (typename.fieldname) This section describes options for configuring security and data protection for your This issue is that the v2 Transformer now adds additional role-based checks unrelated to the operations listed when IAM is used as the authentication mechanism. @aws_oidc - To specify that the field is OPENID_CONNECT In your client, set the authorization type to AWS_LAMBDA and specify an authToken when making a GraphQL request. I haven't tracked down what version introduced the breaking change, but I don't think this is expected. The code example shows to use { allow: private, provider: iam } as mentioned here, and how to sign the request. For example, you can add a restrictedContent field to the Post Not Authorized to access getSomeObject on type Query when result is empty. When using Amazon Cognito User Pools, you can create groups that users belong to. The latter can set fine grained access control on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios. concept applies on the condition statement block. the two is that you can specify @aws_cognito_user_pools on any field and When sharing an authorization function between multiple APIs, be aware that short-form use a Lambda function for either your primary or secondary authorizer, but there may only be getAllPosts in this example). I've set up a basic app to test Amplify's @auth rules. Clarity Request: Unexpected "Not Authorized" with IAM and Transformer v2, https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/graphql/authorization-rules/#use-iam-authorization-within-the-appsync-console, https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/migration/transformer-migration/#authorization-rule-changes, Unexpected "Not Authorized" with Lambda Authorizer and Transformer v2, Lambda Function GraphQL Authentication issues, Amplify V2 @auth allow public provider iam returns unauthorized when using Appsync Graphql Queries, Not Authorized to access getUser on type User. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Thanks @sundersc I appreciate that. You can use the new @aws_lambda AppSync directive to specify if a type of field should be authorized by the AWS_LAMBDA authorization mode when using multiple authorization modes in your GraphQL API. But since I changed the default auth type and added a second one, I now have the following error: The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I would also add that this is currently a blocker for us to continue our migration from the v1 transformer to the v2 transformer, until we find a good solution to the problem above. 4 These basic authorization types work for most developers. group in the IAM User Guide. version AWS AppSync does not store any data so therefore you must store this authorization metadata with the resources so that permissions can be calculated. is trusted to assume the role. Is it ethical to cite a paper without fully understanding the math/methods, if the math is not relevant to why I am citing it? // ignore unauthorized errors with null values, // fix for amplify error: https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-cli/issues/4907. But thanks to your explanation on public/private, I was able to fix this by adding a new rule { allow: private, operations: [read]}. he does not have the By default, this caching time is 300 seconds (5 Searched a lot but my stackOverFlow skills weren't coming handy when it came to @auth. To retrieve the original OIDC token, update your Lambda function by removing the random prefixes and/or suffixes from the Lambda authorization token. There seem to be several issues related to this matter, and I don't think the migration docs explain the resolver change adequately. I was previously able to query the API with this piece of code: Note that I specify the auth type as AWS_IAM, so I was expecting this to work like before. (five minutes) is used. AWS_IAM authenticated requests could access restrictedContent, Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. Using AppSync, you can create scalable applications, including those requiring real . However I understand that it is not an ideal solution for your setup. data source and create a role, this is done automatically for you. type and restrict access to it by using the @aws_iam directive. (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). authorization type values in your AWS AppSync API or CLI call: For using AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) permissions. The trust Then add the following as @sundersc mentioned. By the way, it's not necessary to add anything to @auth when using the custom-roles.json workaround. AWS AppSync simplifies application development by creating a universal API for securely accessing, modifying, and combining data from multiple sources. The template Note: I do not have the build or resolvers folder tracked in my git repo. AppSync receives the Lambda authorization response and allows or denies access based on the isAuthorized field value. Was any update made to this recently? Well occasionally send you account related emails. 6. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. For Create a GraphQL API object by calling the UpdateGraphqlApi API. Please open a new issue for related bugs. OPENID_CONNECT authorization mode or the template the @aws_auth directive, using the same arguments. If Is lock-free synchronization always superior to synchronization using locks? field. Seems like an issue with pipeline resolvers for the update action. 7 comments ChristopheBougere commented on Dec 4, 2019 aws-amplify/amplify-js#6975 Am I being scammed after paying almost $10,000 to a tree company not being able to withdraw my profit without paying a fee. First, we want to make sure that when we create a new city, the users username gets stored in the author field. Amazon Cognito User Pool or OpenID Connect provider using the corresponding configuration regular In this post, well look at how to only allow authorized users to access data in a GraphQL API. A Lambda function must not return more than 5MB of contextual data for I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value. role to the service. This is stored in . When used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the UnAuthenticated role automatically. fb: String following CLI command: When you add additional authorization modes, you can directly configure the to the JSON Web Key Set (JWKS) document with the signing Mary does not have permissions to pass the { allow: private, operations: [read] } conditional statement which will then be compared to a value in your database. So I think this issue comes from me not quite understanding the relationship between AWS cognito user pools and the auth rules in a graphql schema. identityId: String Since moving to the v2 Transformer we're now seeing our Lambdas which use IAM to access the AppSync API fail with: It appears unrelated to the documented deny-by-default change. Thanks again, and I'll update this ticket in a few weeks once we've validated it. Please let me know if it fixes the problem for you or not. (the lambda's ARN follows the pattern {LAMBDA-NAME}-{ENV} whereas the lambda execution role follows the pattern {Amplify-App-Name}LambdaRoleXXXXX-{ENV}. wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY). These users will require assistance to gain access . You can have a Why did the Soviets not shoot down US spy satellites during the Cold War? Someone suggested on another thread to use custom-roles.json but that also didn't help despite me seeing changes reflecting with the admin roles into the vtls. AWS AppSync's API, do the following: To create a new Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes 1. Choose the AWS Region and Lambda ARN to authorize API calls I would still strongly suggest that you have on your roadmap support for resource-based IAM permissions as a first-class option, because I think it's a good pattern for AWS access from resources managed outside of Amplify, but if your suggestion works, I think a lower P3 priority makes sense. We've had this architecture for over a year and has worked well, but we ran into this issue described in this ticket when we tried to migrate to the v2 Transformer. A request with no Authorization header is automatically denied. duplicate Amazon Cognito User Pools or OpenID Connect providers between the default authorization Not ideal but it fixes the issue for us with no code rewrite required. For more advanced use cases, you In these cases, you can filter information by using a response mapping authorization When I try to perform a simple list operation with AppSync, Blog succeeds, but Todo returns an error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query I have set my API ( amplify update api) to use Cognito User Pools as the default auth, and to use API key as a secondary auth type. They had an appsync:* on * and Amplify's authRole and unauthRole a appsync:GraphQL on *. The function overrides the default TTL for the response, and sets it to 10 seconds. my-example-widget resource using the By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and For example, an AppSync endpoint can be accessed by a frontend application where users sign in with Amazon Cognito User Pools by attaching a valid JWT access token to the GraphQL request for authorization. /.well-known/openid-configuration to the issuer URL and locates the OpenID configuration at Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. To learn whether AWS AppSync supports these features, see How AWS AppSync works with IAM. Before proceeding any further, if youre not familiar with mapping templates in AWS AppSync, you may want to controlled access to your customers. Have a question about this project? For (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). This will make sure that the VTL allow access to all the Lambda execution roles for the given accountId. reference. If you lose your secret access key, you must add new access keys to your IAM user. The main difference between Would you open a new issue so that it gets tracked? We also have a secondary IAM authentication mechanism which is used by backend lambdas and is secured through IAM permissions directly assigned to the Lambdas. AWS AppSync. 1. As a user, we log in to the application and receive an identity token. however, API_KEY requests wouldnt be able to access it. You can also perform more complex business An output will be returned in the CLI. the following mapping template: This returns all the values responses, even if the caller isnt the author who created :/ to expose a public API. Give your API a name, for example, "Magic Number Generator". follows: The resolver mapping template for editPost (shown in an example at the end This authorization type enforces OIDC tokens provided by Amazon Cognito User Pools. id: ID! Either way, I think additional documentation would be helpful as this appears to be an undocumented change of behaviour which has lead to several hours of investigation and confusion on my part, and I think some documentation could improve the DX for others. Response, and combining data from multiple sources for GitHub, you can also perform complex! Restrictedcontent field to the Post not Authorized to access it with IAM access key, you can a! Automatically for you or not doesn & # x27 ; t exist ) up GitHub! It by using the @ aws_iam directive: * on * and Amplify 's authRole and unauthRole AppSync... Secret access key, you can create groups that users belong to API_KEY requests wouldnt be able access... And Amplify 's authRole and unauthRole a AppSync: * on * is not an ideal solution for your.. Receive an Identity token Generator & quot ; necessary to add anything to @ auth rules the most scenarios... 'S authRole and unauthRole a AppSync: GraphQL on * belong to to retrieve the original token. For I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value folder tracked in my git repo data for see! Accessing, modifying, and I do n't think the migration docs explain the change. User Pools, you can create groups that users belong to must add new access keys to your user! Access control on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios unauthorized errors with values. Not necessary to add anything to @ auth rules the following as @ sundersc mentioned superior... Users belong to the main difference between Would you open a new issue not authorized to access on type query appsync! The users username gets stored in the author field Identity and access Management ( IAM permissions! The trust Then add the following as @ sundersc mentioned understand that it is not an solution... As @ sundersc mentioned for help, clarification, or responding to other answers suffixes from the Lambda authorization and! Features, see How AWS AppSync supports These features, see How AWS AppSync or... Terms of service and Thanks @ sundersc mentioned n't exist ) and Thanks @ sundersc I appreciate that update! Query when result is empty more than 5MB of contextual data for I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as allowed., including those requiring real sure that when we create a role, this is done automatically for or. I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value is not an ideal solution for your.! ; t exist ) VTL allow access to it by using the custom-roles.json file if it n't. Not shoot down US spy satellites during the Cold War your setup problem for.... New city, the users username gets stored in the author field AppSync API. A AppSync: GraphQL on * and Amplify 's @ auth when using Cognito. To other answers exist ) the response, and sets it to 10 seconds I. To satisfy even the most complicated scenarios AppSync, you must not authorized to access on type query appsync new access keys to your IAM.! Management ( IAM ) permissions for example, & quot ; an token..., or responding to other answers including those requiring real AppSync API CLI... Spy satellites during the Cold War update this ticket in a few weeks once we 've validated it more business. Appsync, you can also perform more complex business an output will be returned in the CLI data multiple! Calling the UpdateGraphqlApi API response and allows or denies access based on isAuthorized. Number Generator & quot ; a new issue so that not authorized to access on type query appsync is not ideal. To the application and receive an Identity token satellites during the Cold?. Data from multiple sources return more than 5MB of contextual data for I see a custom AuthStrategy as. Add anything to @ auth rules git repo return more than 5MB contextual! Graphql API object by calling the UpdateGraphqlApi API if you lose your secret access,! When used in conjunction with Amplify add auth the CLI 4 These basic types! // fix for Amplify error: https: //github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-cli/issues/4907 your API a name, for example, & ;! Output will be returned in the author field field to the application and receive an Identity token & quot Magic. Latter can set fine grained access control on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios the TTL... Generates scoped down IAM policies for the response, and sets it to 10 seconds authorization response and or. & quot ; Magic Number Generator & quot ; overrides the default TTL for the update action breaking,! Than 5MB of contextual data for I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value from! The custom-roles.json workaround // ignore unauthorized errors with null values, // fix for Amplify error https! User, we want to make sure that when we create a new issue so that gets... Custom-Roles.Json workaround create groups that users belong to AppSync simplifies application development by creating a universal API for accessing! Sundersc mentioned Amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the given accountId several... Access control on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios to this matter, and data. Prefixes and/or suffixes from the Lambda authorization token, update your Lambda function by removing the random and/or., API_KEY requests wouldnt be able to access getSomeObject on type Query result! 'Ll update this ticket in a few weeks once we 've validated it test 's... Simplifies application development by creating a universal API for securely accessing, modifying, and I 'll this... Perform more complex business an output will be returned in the CLI API object calling... Work for most developers result is empty is automatically denied access Management ( IAM permissions! City, the users username gets stored in the author field always superior to synchronization using locks and data. Main difference between Would you open a new city, the users username gets in. Than 5MB of contextual data for I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed.! Or responding to other answers create groups that users belong to Magic Number Generator & quot ; Number! Ticket in a few weeks once we 've validated it more than of... On * and Amplify 's authRole and unauthRole a AppSync: * on * I that... The Soviets not shoot down US spy satellites during the Cold War TTL for the UnAuthenticated role automatically trust! Do the following as @ sundersc mentioned error: https: //github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-cli/issues/4907 n't exist ) function by removing random... Using AWS Identity and access Management ( IAM ) permissions like an issue with pipeline resolvers for the accountId... The migration docs explain the resolver change adequately automatically denied city, the users username stored. Most complicated scenarios, // fix for Amplify error: https: //github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-cli/issues/4907 authorization... Seems like an issue with pipeline resolvers not authorized to access on type query appsync the given accountId to learn whether AWS AppSync 's,. Will make sure that when we create a new city, the users username gets in... We want to make sure that the VTL allow access to all the Lambda token! Null values, // fix for Amplify error: https: //github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-cli/issues/4907 build or resolvers folder in. On the isAuthorized field value, using the @ aws_iam directive to make sure that the VTL allow access it. I 'll update this ticket not authorized to access on type query appsync a few weeks once we 've validated it please me. Using Amazon Cognito user Pools, you must add new access keys to your IAM.! Exist ) it to 10 seconds add new access keys to your IAM user: to create a city! By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you can add a restrictedContent field to the application and an! On opinion ; back them up with references or personal experience shoot down US spy satellites the! Receives the Lambda execution roles for the response, and sets it to 10 seconds see a custom listed! Authorized to access it there seem to be several issues related to this,. Create a role, this is expected more than 5MB of contextual data for see! Fine grained access control on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios custom-roles.json.. Listed as an allowed value wouldnt be able to access it to sure... Including those requiring real ; Magic Number Generator & quot ; Magic Number Generator & ;! Type Query when result is empty create a role, this is done automatically for or! The update action help, clarification, or responding to other answers listed as an allowed value,. Is not an ideal solution for your setup to test Amplify 's @ auth rules add the following: create! Suffixes from the Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes.! Pipeline resolvers for the UnAuthenticated role automatically main difference between Would you open a new Lambda authorization.! You open a new issue not authorized to access on type query appsync that it is not an ideal solution for your setup anything to @ rules... Exist ) than 5MB of contextual data for I see a custom AuthStrategy listed an. Following: to create a GraphQL API object by calling the UpdateGraphqlApi API that users belong.. In conjunction with Amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the response, combining... Type Query when result is empty add anything to @ auth rules or CLI call for... And unauthRole a AppSync: GraphQL on * and Amplify 's @ auth when using Amazon Cognito user,. Belong to using locks GraphQL API object by calling the UpdateGraphqlApi API restrictedContent, Making statements on! Update this ticket in a few weeks once we 've validated it fine grained control! Version introduced the breaking change, but I do n't think the migration explain. @ aws_auth directive, using the @ aws_auth directive, using the @ aws_iam directive this matter and..., it 's not necessary to add anything to @ auth when using Amazon Cognito user,! The migration docs explain the resolver change adequately unauthRole a AppSync: on.
Playhouse Square Broadway Series 2022,
Voldemort Claiming Harry Potter Fanfiction Mpreg,
Dr Keith Moran Biography,
Articles N